| Re: Action item #2 - Module development standards |
| by rowdie on 2005/9/11 12:31:59 Thanks Marco  I've found my notes of the changes I made, so I'm adding them to the file you found. You have saved me a lot of time. I haven't finished yet, and I am so incredibly busy at the moment that I can't say when I'll be finished, but I just wanted to let you know that I am still working on it. Rowd |
| Re: Action item #2 - Module development standards |
| by Marco on 2005/9/3 8:34:55 i've found it on my HD! marco |
| Re: Action item #2 - Module development standards |
| by rowdie on 2005/8/28 15:33:43 Don't know where that file is at the moment, I'll repost it when I find it again. As far as I know I was the only one working on this, together with input from Mithrandir. I stopped when I realised how pointless that was, standards needs more input from others. So on this action item, the last version of that file was as far as I got and it wasn't a complete standards yet. |
| Re: Action item #2 - Module development standards |
| by Marco on 2005/8/28 13:54:13 rowdie, could you please post again your file, that has disappeared due to summer visitors.  Quote:
how things are gone in this area ? marco |
| Re: Action item #2 - Module development standards |
| by Dave_L on 2005/4/5 19:56:46 That's a good point, and I have some comments on it, but I think it would be better to discuss that in a new thread, since this thread is concerned with the module development standards as a whole, and not with individual details of the standards. ---- Edit I've reposted banned's post here. Please discuss it there, rather than in this thread. |
Search
Recent Posts
Who's Online
Donat-O-Meter
| Stats | |
| Goal: | $15.00 |
| Due Date: | Jul 31 |
| Gross Amount: | $0.00 |
| Net Balance: | $0.00 |
| Left to go: | $15.00 |
|
|