Subject:*
<
Name/Email:*
<
Message Icon:*
<
Select*
<
Message:*
<



Click the Preview to see the content in action.
Options:*
<
Confirmation Code*
<
1 + 8 = ?  
Input the result from the expression
Maximum attempts you can try: 10
*
<
   

Re: Xoops On Crack?
by leperkuan on 2005/9/20 20:18:25

i didnt mean to start a forum war with my questions, i did find out in the end i screwed up but fixed it so nobody is on crack now. although i am happy this is the biggest forum ive started ty all
Re: Xoops On Crack?
by jdseymour on 2005/7/2 6:25:35

I still use the protector. I use it mainly for added assurance, plus logging of the attacks. GIJOE will update the protector I am sure as new holes are found (and there will always be some). The protector is a great module that does a great job without using a lot of resources.
Re: Xoops On Crack?
by ALineberger on 2005/7/2 6:21:06

Not to resurrect this beast once the stake was truly driven through it's heart, but having read the entire thread in one sitting, I am still wondering if the security holes seen by the Asian/Brazilian contingents were all fixed? Should you still use Protector - does it even apply after 2.0.12a?

Looking at GIJOE's change log for the latest version -
2.40RC2 (2005/4/4)
That's almost three months with no change. In fact no change since before 2.0.10 was released. That can be read as his supreme confidence that he's got it locked down. Or read as he's got better things to be working on as Protector is no longer as necessary as it was. I would truly like to know which of those two possibilities is closest to the truth.


Any learned commentary would be most appreciated.


---------------
Am I being paranoid? You betcha. Does it mean there ain't anybody after me? No bet.
Re: Xoops On Crack?
by DonXoop on 2005/6/22 18:01:07

Quote:

m0nty wrote:
well nice bump jamesbond..

altho i must admit, everytime this topic gets bumped, i always have a chuckle at Dons' last post..

Quote:

Back on topic...
After reading this thread I've determined for myself that XOOPS is NOT on crack. I'm pretty sure about that. For me that closes this one. (that doesn't mean that all XOOPS users aren't on crack, the code is fine {core})


always a laugh in my mind :)


hehe.

I still say that it isn't XOOPS that is on crack, it is some of the users.

We have a show up here (don't like it) called "Strange Days, Indeed". indeed.
Re: Xoops On Crack?
by Mikhail on 2005/6/22 1:17:37

Quote:

minahito wrote:

Translation of document isn't important. I learned many 'programming technique' from the American book written in English.(we can buy American books in Amazon Japan.) but I can't read English.

We may not be able to talk and exchange a document, because many japanese aren't good at English. but, we can exchange 'proguram code'.



I agree, 100%. And i'm thinking about your post,... because many brazilians aren't good in English, and dont visit xoops.org. but the the people that work with tecnology needs to understand it.

Quote:

'program code' is an excellent international language for us.


is true? exist a language called 'program code'?

Quote:

that is better than Esperanto.


And I think "Interlingua" better than esperanto,
much more "natural" and impartial...

I dont know, but esperanto looks like français...
not easy to be lerned....



Idea: create a forum called "Sorry for my poor english".

Who's Online

218 user(s) are online (161 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 218


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $15.00
Due Date: Jul 31
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $15.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits