| Re: SEO (Search Engine Optimization) In Action |
| by carnuke on 2005/8/31 7:10:10 Quote: I will also try to convince module developer to merge this hack else I will maintain my own fork. There lies the chalenge! 1- can you convince them, or persude them of the benefits? 2- can you really maintain all modules? better way is to make a 'kit' a simple conversion method that anyone an apply to any module they are using. The problem is that not all module developers adere to similar methods of construction. Your ideas are very valuable and indeed we need an effective short url hack, but it should be comprehensive for all modules, I think. Please keep going with this development  Richard |
| Re: SEO (Search Engine Optimization) In Action |
| by sudhaker on 2005/8/31 5:30:52 Google indexed all of my SEO page very quickly  Check this  I also see google-page-rank of 2 just in few days.
|
| Re: SEO (Search Engine Optimization) In Action |
| by sudhaker on 2005/8/30 2:37:11 I also added code to make link or category title appears in page title 
|
| Re: SEO (Search Engine Optimization) In Action |
| by sudhaker on 2005/8/29 5:47:24 @carnuke I learned few things from older short URL hack but did not like their ob_start approach. Also their huge regex replacemnet will add more to the server load. My short URL hack is optimized and is very much module specific. I will be doing similar hack for other modules as well (which I will use for my sites - tinycontent, smartsection, smartfaq...etc). I will also try to convince module developer to merge this hack else I will maintain my own fork. In the final shape, a constant defined in mainfile.php should change the behavior of any shortURL aware module. This will be able to serve regular URL and short URL both based on server's capability and webmaster's wish. Entry in mainfile.php can be something like this: define('XOOPS_SEO_ENABLED', 1); |
| Re: SEO (Search Engine Optimization) In Action |
| by sudhaker on 2005/8/29 5:26:37 @ LazyBadger - You are right about parameterized URL. My mistake. Robots treat h1 and h2 tags with higher preference than other tags, isn’t it? Page title is having even higher preference. So what if we have keywords in URL itself? My feeling is that, having http://thej2ee.com/software.cat.130/web-frameworks.html http://thej2ee.com/software.link.1488/struts.html is always better than http://thej2ee.com/software.cat.130/ http://thej2ee.com/software.link.1488/ which is better than http://thej2ee.com/software/cat/130/ http://thej2ee.com/software/link/1488/ which is better than http://thej2ee.com/module/software/viewcat.php?cid=130 http://thej2ee.com/module/software/singlelink.php?lid=1488 Will do some more research to find out the truth. Also, I should see results in few weeks. |
Search
Recent Posts
Who's Online
Donat-O-Meter
| Stats | |
| Goal: | $15.00 |
| Due Date: | Jul 31 |
| Gross Amount: | $0.00 |
| Net Balance: | $0.00 |
| Left to go: | $15.00 |
|
|