FreeContent v2.01 with Smarty, Xoops comments and Tutorial - Modules - XOOPS News

XOOPS

News

News World of XOOPS Developers Hacks Themes Archive Submit News

Modules: FreeContent v2.01 with Smarty, Xoops comments and Tutorial

Posted by: wjueOn 2003/4/23 0:24:12 5826 reads

FreeContent but modernized with Smarty, Xoops comments feature, Search and also a Tutorial for using it. The Data base structure is not changed so you can backup your settings and reuse it.

CJcontent would be more appropriate if you want an editor to be built-in but I just can't stop using FreeContent as I am so accustomed to it. And I release it as a nostalgic alternative

Download here

The comments are owned by the author. We aren't responsible for their content.

Re: FreeContent v2.01

mktwain124 Published 04/23/2003 3:00 Just popping in Joined 09/27/2002 Comments 44

Thanks, wjue, it works like a charm!

Re: FreeContent v2.01 with Smarty, Xoops comments and Tutori

forlon Published 04/23/2003 3:05 Just popping in Joined 01/21/2002 Comments 76

It is ok to make a new version of freecontent and I hope you have the permission of the old Freecontent developer like I do.
But it is not ok to make suggestion to whom C-JAY Content is more appropriate.
Let the User decide, since the editor is not the only difference.

Re: FreeContent v2.01 with Smarty, Xoops comments and Tutori

mbogosian Published 04/23/2003 7:36 Just popping in Joined 09/30/2002 Comments 53

Pardon the ignorance, but for those of use who are new to this topic, what exactly is FreeContent? Is there a demo or screenshots or manual anywhere? Curious minds....

FreeContent vs. C-JayContent (Appropriateness)

Bunny Published 04/23/2003 10:10 Updated 04/23/2003 14:01 XOOPS Advisor Joined 10/21/2002 Comments 57

a) Since the old FreeContent module was released under the GPL, no permission is needed to distribute improved/modified versions.

b) Discussing the relative benefits of one module over the other is more than appropriate for a website like this. Discussions like this help the user make a decision. You are welcome to comment on the other differences beside the editor.

c) Even though you gave your module a new name, it is still a modification of FreeContent, so it is not ok under the terms of the GPL to remove the original author's copyright notice from the files and replace it with your own.

Re: FreeContent v2.01

Tresend Published 04/23/2003 11:46 Just popping in Joined 02/15/2003 Comments 55

The link doesn't work for me, could someone who has gotten it possibly upload the zip file to their own site so that I could download it or something?....

Re: FreeContent vs. C-JayContent (Appropriateness)

forlon Published 04/23/2003 14:29 Just popping in Joined 01/21/2002 Comments 76

Ok, this does not really belong to here, but I am curious.

to 1) maybe the Permission is not needed, I think nobody likes to have his ideas "stolen". So in my opinion asking of permission is just a matter of good behaviour. I do not like this you do not have to so there is not a need to do it.

to 2) It wasn't a discussion. It was just told that C-JAY Content has an Online Editor and that would be the only reason to use it. Again, it is a matter of good behaviour just to talk about your own stuff and not about other's.

to 3)Maybe you are right here. I thought it would be enough to mention the fact that C-JAY Content is based on old freecontent somewhere inside the module. I did so in the first Version. Maybe I should read the GPL more closly when I have time.

Re: FreeContent vs. C-JayContent (Appropriateness)

Jan304 Published 04/23/2003 19:22 Official Support Member Joined 03/31/2002 Comments 520

Forlon, in please of immediatly attacking someone, you might wanne try to work together to develop better en faster.

Just an idea...

Re: FreeContent v2.01

Rooster Published 04/24/2003 4:50 Just popping in Joined 04/01/2003 Comments 32

Quote:

The link doesn't work for me, could someone who has gotten it possibly upload the zip file to their own site so that I could download it or something?....

Right click on the link, and use "save target as". It's a single PHP file.

The Link is Dead

finalfiler Published 04/24/2003 7:49 Documentation Writer Joined 01/19/2002 Comments 111

The link doesn't work for me. Attempting to loadhttp://www.wjue.org/ results in a "timed out"

Re: The Link is Dead

ssong Published 04/24/2003 9:06 Just popping in Joined 01/05/2003 Comments 19

try this link:
http://www.wjue.org/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?lid=3

Re: The Link works now

Rooster Published 04/24/2003 15:50 Just popping in Joined 04/01/2003 Comments 32

Thanks, this one works.

Login

Username

Password

Remember me

Search

Advanced Search

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal:	$100.00
Due Date:	Apr 30
Gross Amount:	$0.00
Net Balance:	$0.00
Left to go:	$100.00

Latest GitHub Commits

{{ record.sha.slice(0, 7) }} - {{ record.commit.message | truncate }}

{{ record.commit.author.name }} {{ record.commit.author.date | formatDate }}

Modules: FreeContent v2.01 with Smarty, Xoops comments and Tutorial

Re: FreeContent v2.01

Re: FreeContent v2.01 with Smarty, Xoops comments and Tutori

Re: FreeContent v2.01 with Smarty, Xoops comments and Tutori

FreeContent vs. C-JayContent (Appropriateness)

Re: FreeContent v2.01

Re: FreeContent vs. C-JayContent (Appropriateness)

Re: FreeContent vs. C-JayContent (Appropriateness)

Re: FreeContent v2.01

The Link is Dead

Re: The Link is Dead

Re: The Link works now

Login

Search

Recent Comments

Re: XOOPS 2.5.11 Final Released

Re: XOOPS 2.5.11 Final Released

Re: XOOPS 2.5.11 Final Released

Re: XOOPS 2.5.11 Final Released

Re: XOOPS 2.5.11 Final Released

Who's Online

Donat-O-Meter

Latest GitHub Commits

{{ record.sha.slice(0, 7) }} - {{ record.commit.message | truncate }}

Archives

News archives