XOOPS 
Forum
Forum Index General Forums Community Support Modules Support Themes Support Development International Support Module Hack Reviews Theme Designer Talk
  1. Board index / 
  2. XOOPS Modules Support forums / 
  3. Module usage questions 
  4.  / TinyD vs Tiny Content
Register
1
jimbofoxman
TinyD vs Tiny Content

Any reason to use one over the other?

I have TinyD 2.3 on a site already and need to use something similar on a new site.
2
Alan-A
Re: TinyD vs Tiny Content

  • 2007/6/17 12:17

  • Alan-A

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 191

  • Since: 2004/2/17


hi,
as I looked at these modules (about 2 years ago) TinyD was the duplicable version of Tiny Content, which meant that I could install it more than once and thereby achieve a more flexible information structure (i.e. several entries in the XOOPS standard menu)
Alan
...
3
nachenko
Re: TinyD vs Tiny Content

  • 2007/6/17 12:31

  • nachenko

  • Quite a regular

  • Posts: 356

  • Since: 2005/1/18


Alan-A is right, but:

ยท GiJoe considers TinyD obsolete and reccommends PiCo instead:

http://xoops.peak.ne.jp/md/mydownloads/singlefile.php?lid=92&cid=1

. I don't know how PiCo is, but if you want to manage more than a few pages with this, you should try MasTop publish instead.
4
alfred
Re: TinyD vs Tiny Content

  • 2007/6/17 12:46

  • alfred

  • Quite a regular

  • Posts: 249

  • Since: 2005/10/29


testing the DH-INFO Modul
here

Alfred
5
script_fu
Re: TinyD vs Tiny Content

Alfred thanks for the link! I was unaware of this module. I will be running this one on my test site tonight...
6
alfred
Re: TinyD vs Tiny Content

  • 2007/6/17 13:47

  • alfred

  • Quite a regular

  • Posts: 249

  • Since: 2005/10/29


You can testing a new Version
Download by Sourceforge.net

Alfred
7
hackbrill
Re: TinyD vs Tiny Content

  • 2007/6/17 14:19

  • hackbrill

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 283

  • Since: 2005/7/14


Noticed the following in the Readme of Pico:

Quote:
(3) copy two files under html/class/smarty/plugins/ in the archive into your class/smarty/plugins/


One of those two files, namely "function.xoopsdhtmlarea.php" will be overwritten. Will this affect a XOOPS 2.0.16 installation adversely?

Also, Peak XOOPS has announced the following:

Quote:

Have You Fixed The Incompatibility?
If you use the core 2.0.14/15/16 from xoops.org and you want to try my modules, you have to fix the incompatibility (I believe this is a BUG) of core.
Read how to fix XOOPS 2.0.16

Has this bug fix been implemented, and if not, has it been planned for the next release? I really like the way GIJoe uses the XOOPS_Trust_Path for his modules and it seems that he will be designing all of his modules to use this strategy.

Login

Register now!  |  Lost Password?

Search

Advanced Search

Recent Posts

Who's Online

173 user(s) are online (119 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)

Members: 0

Guests: 173

more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Apr 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits