1
piratos
Xoops nearly 100% valid XHTML
  • 2004/7/27 18:25

  • piratos

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 7

  • Since: 2004/7/12


Xoops-friends can show a nearly 100% valid XHTML XOOPS 2.07 (themes=x2t) under http://xoops.coftware.de

2
synistar
Re: Xoops nearly 100% valid XHTML
  • 2004/7/28 20:22

  • synistar

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 18

  • Since: 2004/7/19


Your front page validates when I check it - its a full 100% valid as far as I am concerned. :)

I also set up my XOOPS site (Webguys.com) to be XHTML. It validates on the front page and most of the main pages but I found some issues with certain modules and core sections. But I believe the developers have said that future versions of XOOPS will imporve compatibility with XHTML.

Also if you will notice, my site layout is entirely CSS based. No tables (except where the XOOPS forms module is used).

I may release my theme later on but it requires major modifications to most module templates used. Since most modules are laid out with the default table based layout in mind.

Hopefully in the future XOOPS will have more (XHTML/CSS) web standards friendliness out of the box (changing all those module templates is a pain).


3
brash
Re: Xoops nearly 100% valid XHTML
  • 2004/7/28 22:28

  • brash

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 2206

  • Since: 2003/4/10


You're not wrong synistar, I was looking at getting a site myself and a mate run to be XHTML compliant with layout handled purely by CSS, but there looks to be a fairly large amount of work to be done with the templates to get it this way, so I'm starting to have second thoughts now. Nice work on your theme by the way. Simple, clean, and VERY fast.

4
shivaji
Re: Xoops nearly 100% valid XHTML [flash ??]
  • 2004/7/29 9:35

  • shivaji

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 179

  • Since: 2003/9/18


more points if replace validator URI with http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://xoops.coftware.de

Validating flash in my XOOPS site becomes tough because of EMBED tag not supported by XHTML 1.0 anymore but I also wanted Netscape to show flash. Rescue come from

The Satay Method

uff it works

http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.anblik.com

5
shivaji
Re: Xoops nearly 100% valid XHTML & CSS
  • 2004/8/29 13:12

  • shivaji

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 179

  • Since: 2003/9/18


For CSS validation, only thing you need to change is, someone who is using XoopsPartners Module, should turned off "Partners Block" -> Fade Image -> to "No". Opacity filter is not part of CSS Validation. It doesn't recognize the opacity filter tag.

Login

Who's Online

367 user(s) are online (261 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 367


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Nov 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits