36
Well as far as I am concerned, I think the fledgling council was formed fairly to allow for speed of action. If we organized to vote for everything right from the start it may be the middle of next year before we get any new code. And furthermore this type of discussion of how not to do something also delays results.
The proper way for change is to first accept this council as a start. If there are disagreements in the way it is done, first create a proposal with your changes, submit it to the council for review, and wait to see the outcome. They may not take all suggestions, or every part of one suggestion. But the suggestions will be heard and I am sure will be welcome.
I look at the comments on the news item of the announcement and out of 89 comments, I see about 85 comments that should not have been posted, a formal submission of a new method of forming the council should have been submitted to the council instead.
The community wants action. Action to the project means code. I personally do not care if we have to hire an actual dictator to get the ball rolling. The project has been stalled, and I finally see action towards the goal. We need to help, not hinder those that are helping the community. And go through proper channels when we have a true complaint.