Mailusers function is not active? [2.5.x Support]

1

Mailusers function is not active?

2011/3/3 3:59
Nick_James
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 359
Since: 2006/10/14

Upgraded site to 2.5.p

When .../modules/system/admin.php?fct=mailusers

I now get an error... "This section is not active!"

How do I reactivate this section?

2

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

2011/3/5 0:49
Nick_James
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 359
Since: 2006/10/14

anybody... ???

Nicholas James
President - LaDads
www.ladads.info

3

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

2011/3/5 3:38
Nick_James
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 359
Since: 2006/10/14

hello?

Nicholas James
President - LaDads
www.ladads.info

4

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

2011/3/5 5:07
iHackCode
Module Developer
Posts: 1038
Since: 2004/6/29

Which version of xoops did you upgrade from? (i want to check if all of the steps were done in the upgrade process)

CBB / LatestNews / Publisher / XM-Spotlight

(ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧

5

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

2011/3/5 13:51
Anonymous
Posts: 0
Since:

Can we assume that you've done the "checksum" check on the system files when you upgraded? Might be a missing/corrupt file.

Also, have you "updated" the system/core modules in Admin since the upgrade? If not then it might help if you do.

6

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

2011/3/5 14:17
iHackCode
Module Developer
Posts: 1038
Since: 2004/6/29

Quote:

JAVesey wrote:
Also, have you "updated" the system/core modules in Admin since the upgrade? If not then it might help if you do.

i was also thinking about something in that area. the /upgrade folder has scripts that change the config in the database that enables the new config setting.

CBB / LatestNews / Publisher / XM-Spotlight

(ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*:･ﾟ✧

7

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

2011/3/5 20:46
Nick_James
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 359
Since: 2006/10/14

Yes. I passed the checksum.

Note: On the checksum, is there an easy way to have it checksum the two folders that are meant to be moved out of the root?

Or is it best to leave them where they are, do the check sum, and then move them after the upload is complete. (course this doesn't really work for an upgrade, cause the folders are already moved.)

8

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

2011/3/5 21:00
Nick_James
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 359
Since: 2006/10/14

Ah, now that is a good thought.

I think you are right that the system module was not updated.

I can't get to that directly, but if I update one of the other modules, copy that line and replace the module with 'system'...

As in:
.../modules/system/admin.php?fct=modulesadmin&op=update&module=system

Yes, that worked. Now the system module is updated.

Lets see if that solves the problem.

9

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

2011/3/5 21:01
Nick_James
Friend of XOOPS
Posts: 359
Since: 2006/10/14

Oh my, what a difference that makes !!!

Thanks guys.

10

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

2011/3/5 21:11
Anonymous
Posts: 0
Since:

Quote:

Nick_James wrote:
Oh my, what a difference that makes !!!

<coughs>It's in the upgrade instructions<coughs>

Does this mean that you're all sorted out and happy, and that your have access to everything you should have?

If so then "yay"

Stats
Goal:	$100.00
Due Date:	Apr 30
Gross Amount:	$0.00
Net Balance:	$0.00
Left to go:	$100.00

Mailusers function is not active?

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

Re: Mailusers function is not active?

Login

Search

Recent Posts

Re: Rebuilding and Updating a 20 years old Xoops Website from 2.0.18? to 2.5.11

Rebuilding and Updating a 20 years old Xoops Website from 2.0.18? to 2.5.11

Re: NewBB v 5.1.0 b 6

Re: NewBB v 5.1.0 b 6

NewBB v 5.1.0 b 6

Re: XOOPS 2.5.11 search user is not working

Re: oledrion

Re: oledrion

Re: oledrion

Re: oledrion

Who's Online

Donat-O-Meter

Latest GitHub Commits

{{ record.sha.slice(0, 7) }} - {{ record.commit.message | truncate }}