1
Moving the discussion of these topics
from this thread, since it lead to be off topic:
BlueStocking wrote:Quote:
http://upnrunnin.hypermart.net/xoops03/
Category:Repository_Redevelopment
I had thought about redoing the older documents by editing to bring up to a more current status, and soon found out I did not know enough about XOOPS to be able to do that.
I do believe that if XOOPS WIKI was opened to allow for a free flow of information it would be possible to achieve.
There has to be an area of trust to "let it happen"
Communications is a delicate area, often misinterpeted.
BlueStockings
snow77 wrote:Quote:
quoting BlueStocking
Quote:I do believe that if XOOPS WIKI was opened to allow for a free flow of information it would be possible to achieve.
As current owner and administrator of xoopswiki.org (if it is that site you were referring to), I don't understand at all the meaning of your sentence.
snow77 wrote:Quote:
BTW what does this have to do with the Skenow's member nomination thread? maybe you could move these two last posts too as it seems off topic.
BlueStocking wrote:Quote:
Snow,
Sorry if you found my remarks offensive. I misunderstood the intent of the thread, I thought is was about doing documentation and contributing to Xoops, I missed the nonimation part.
Free flow of information is when you pick up on a subject and are allow to let it flow in whatever direction it takes.
BlueStocking
I didn't take it as offensive, I just couldn't/can't find a meaning to what you said, as it seemed to me that you found something in the wiki that didn't allow for the interaction of information be done in the correct manner, but you never mentioned the root of what you think is the obstacle you have found.
BlueStocking wrote:Quote:
Free flow of information is when you pick up on a subject and are allow to let it flow in whatever direction it takes.
Do you give birth to a child and let him take every path that is presented to him under any kind of influence?
-------------------------------------------
Anyways, concerning the xoopswiki site, it's closed right now but won't be closed forever. I am doing hosting maintenance to it and have donated the domain to the XOOPS foundation. It remains as an independent site to provide the XOOPS community a working space, owned by community members and am in plans of reorganizing administrative roles as I no longer plan to be site manager.
All organizational structure concerns like the one expressed by BlueStocking can be done at the xoopswiki forum when it opens. I'll continue participating there as normal user, the final decisions being taken by the administrators left in charge.