1
stance
Re: Enable user moderation - CBB
  • 2011/8/17 9:54

  • stance

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 29

  • Since: 2010/11/19


uhmm thank you Mamba... I was in a dream that it was something like, members could be moderators of the threads they have started...

I need something that a member who has started a thread, would be able to change the title and the first message of the thread even after the edit time has passed.



2
stance
Re: Enable user moderation - CBB
  • 2011/8/16 9:56

  • stance

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 29

  • Since: 2010/11/19


same question, please...



3
stance
Re: xoops chat integration (like facebook) ?
  • 2011/3/26 19:43

  • stance

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 29

  • Since: 2010/11/19


An interesting problem:

There is a ".textcenter" class in xim.css and this style ruins the private message page's style because it also has a .textcenter class.



4
stance
Re: xoops chat integration (like facebook) ?
  • 2010/12/9 22:15

  • stance

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 29

  • Since: 2010/11/19


Hello again, Firstly it's active in my website now and i must mention that it's brought a wave of excitement to the members :)

Here are the notes i've written down. The first one is the most important, and could be counted as a bug... the others are more likely ideas:

(I'm using Xoops 2.5)


1-This story below happened twice with two seperate members and me, one of them was online and the other was busy:

I'd written to a member and (s)he replied. We had a short conversation. Then i closed the dialogue box. A few minutes later, while browsing the website, the dialogue box appeared again, with just the first message, like it was never replied.

To make it clearer, here is an example with just an imaginary conversation:

First person: Hello, the time is 17:30 here, what's the time there? (1st message)
Second person: Hello it is 19.30 here? (2)
First person: Ok thank you (3)
Second person: Your welcome

--Second person closes the dialogue box
--A few minutes later, the dialogue box appears on the second person's screen, like it was never replied:

First person: Hello, the time is 17:30 here, what's the time there?

--And it appears in the first person's screen, like he sent the first message to himself. I mean, the title of this dialogue box is not the second person's name, it's first person's.

Probably there is a problem with the control system of the message's receiving status. I didn't check the database if it was recorded as "received" or not. I can do it next time, if needed.

2- The options area doesn't close when you update it (in the tiny mode). This is not very important but i think it should close itself after update.

3- Let's say i set my status as online. Then i quit the website and come back. My status comes as "away" again. I think it should be what i set latest.

4- When i click the middle icon at the right top of the dialogue box, in the middle of the minimize and close icons; it makes the dialogue box non-closable. Is this its aim? If it is, i think the box should be closable again when you re-click it. And when i refresh the page, that property is reset. Well, may be, I really didn't get the idea of that icon.

5- Another idea is, the administrator could add a custom icon with custom link to the footer bar.

6- When the connection is slow, the border images of the dialogue box is shown late. I think there should be an option of not using them.

7- The idea of movable dialogue boxes is very nice and it works alright. Besides, some members are used to have them all attached to the footer bar, because of facebook chat. I think this could be an option for them.

8- Sometimes, the online people list comes late because of internal connection slowness or some other reasons. I think the online list should be cached, and brought to the friends list from that cache. This would make it faster. And in the background, the system can check if the friends list is up to date or not and refresh it if needed. This would make users not wait for the list in every refresh of the page.

9- I think there is no need for status icons for the online friends. The icons should be seen just for busy and away friends. (I suppose the offline friends are not seen in the list) This would strain the eyes less.

10- The user's status light should be seen as a colored dot next to the "Friends" text.

11- Deafult status should be set by the administrator.

---

Of course these are just ideas and according to me most of them are not obligatory for 1.0 release either.

I appreciate your hard work, the system works nice without these also and that's why i've started to use it in my website :) The ideas are just for constructive criticism.

Kind regards,









5
stance
Re: xoops chat integration (like facebook) ?
  • 2010/12/9 14:26

  • stance

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 29

  • Since: 2010/11/19


Congratulations :)

It seems the things are going alright in these very first minutes of my test -setting aside the friends list came empty in the beginning, but it's alright now.



6
stance
Re: Login Problem with constants "_MB_SYSTEM_REMEMBERME" and "_US_REMEMBERME"
  • 2010/12/6 17:06

  • stance

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 29

  • Since: 2010/11/19


I've removed the rows which use those constants from those files. In any case, i don't need them. I hope this will help.



7
stance
Re: xoops chat integration (like facebook) ?
  • 2010/12/5 23:17

  • stance

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 29

  • Since: 2010/11/19


Thank you culex, this is exciting :)



8
stance
Login Problem with constants "_MB_SYSTEM_REMEMBERME" and "_US_REMEMBERME"
  • 2010/12/5 21:05

  • stance

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 29

  • Since: 2010/11/19


Error Messages:

Notice: Use of undefined constant _MB_SYSTEM_REMEMBERME - assumed '_MB_SYSTEM_REMEMBERME' in file /modules/system/blocks/system_blocks.php line 98

Notice: Use of undefined constant _US_REMEMBERME - assumed '_US_REMEMBERME' in file /user.php line 56

Deprecated
'/class/mimetypes.inc.php' is deprecated, use '/include/mimetypes.inc.php' directly.

Story:

This problem occurs randomly when a user tries to login. It doesn't happen always. I've got many complaints from my members, that they couldn't login to the system and i've replied them it could be because of cookie settings of their browser.

Today, that happened to me either and i've logged in from another browser, turned on the debug mode, then tried to login from the first browser that didn't log me in again, and i got the error message above.

Investigation:

As an investigation, it seems it mostly happens when a user opens the browser when the pc didn't finish the startup issues yet and still running for them. I'm not sure if this is just a coincidence or the reason of this problem but it is a guess.

Additional Information:

And i think this is important here : The template i'm using does not have a "Remember me" checkbox.

Kind regards



9
stance
Re: xoops chat integration (like facebook) ?
  • 2010/12/3 14:40

  • stance

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 29

  • Since: 2010/11/19


--




10
stance
Re: xoops chat integration (like facebook) ?
  • 2010/12/3 14:19

  • stance

  • Just popping in

  • Posts: 29

  • Since: 2010/11/19


Another important thing, i've noticed now... It seems the module cannot be blocked for a group of users.

I've disabled the module access of a user group while the footer is on.

The template went crazy, some divs got confused and the system got all users of that group out, saying "You are not authorized to access this area"

(Xoops 2.5)




TopTop
(1) 2 3 »



Login

Who's Online

233 user(s) are online (126 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 233


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Mar 31
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits