71
instantzero
[bad boy] Excuse me

Excuse me for being a bad boy but ... we take the same boys and .... we do it again ?
Mister A told to Mister B he is a good boy and Mister B told to mister A that he is a good boy too.
Where is the real change ?

I give my voice to mboyden who did not received any "good boy" from anybody :
https://xoops.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=59321&forum=47



72
instantzero
Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

jmorris, vaughan,

You belong to the worst things which arrived to xoops. You are in the top 10.
Do you know what users can see ?
Two doggies trying to create doggies fight to compensate the complete lack of changes in Xoops.

And you are accusing the others to create flaming posts ....
We can just see one thing, you are trying to make the valuable users and contributors to go out.


Concerning the new server and the new repository ... who cares ?
Do you believe that's what users are waiting for ?
Hey men, I bought a new pants last week ...

It will be useful for what ? For your business, that's all.
You're going to write an article, or you will be part of an article, when this new server will be visible (if people can see it one day) and after ???
Does it change anything to XOOPS ?
No !

The proof, nobody can't give an answer to smart2 or to the community.

Concerning the version which is "discussed" (denigrate is the exact word) in this thread, strange that one thing made by one person can't be done by a "team", the "official" team

This version, that's true, "breaks the compatibility" with the "official" XOOPS version.
But at the last news, the "official" version is 8 months old and does not include any of the patches who were proposed by the community

Now, SHA 256 or Whirlpool hash, it does not change anything because it will be break one day.

FYI, this version hashes passwords in SHA256 AND in MD5. The goal is not to bring a total security (this does not exist on Internet) but to slow down the hackers. If you can't
understand it, we can't do anything for you...

You are denigrating the others and their work but you do not come with any answer.
For example to the one I asked here. Your forums are full of this :

Quote:

Post removed by moderator
Please Note: The original text of this post was posted by someone else then the apparent author.


WHY ?


Things are changing but you can't even see them :
http://www.frxoops.org/modules/news/article.php?storyid=1336

You do not deserve any answer and this is the last you will have.



73
instantzero
Re: Xoops 2.0.17 released (Unofficial version) by Hervé

Quote:

jmorris wrote:
Also, there is a patch for most if not all the bugfixes ready on SF.net. If people want to make something useful, they're allowed to test / review the available patches, or even apply them to a 2.0.16 and release some kind of "patched 2.0.16 with bugfixes not yet entirely official"

"If people want to make something useful" LOL
As everybody can see, the bugfixes submitted by everybody was not used in any version

Quote:

jmorris wrote:
I would strongly encourage anyone who wishes to maintain compatibility with the future versions of XOOPS to NOT use this unsupported version.

I would strongly encourage anyone not to hear him
Really, are you so bored on xoops.org ?


Quote:

vaughan wrote:
i'm not even entirely convinced that the changes made to the password are fully necessary anyway

Listen to the security expert

Your forums are full of this :
Quote:

Post removed by moderator
Please Note: The original text of this post was posted by someone else then the apparent author.

How do you believe this was made ?

Really, are you so bored on xoops.org ?
Anything better to do than to denigrate the work made by the others ?

PS : In how many times this answer will be "moderated" ?



74
instantzero
Re: Our modules are not anymore available for download

we talked (at least we begin) and our modules are available for download.



75
instantzero
Re: Repository: Rules discussion

Our modules will not be listed just because of 2 or 3 #oops# points !

We are not judged on the quality but on the fact that :

1/ We don't have a licence file inside our modules (when it's not required AND when EACH Php script as a recall to the GPL licence)
2/ Because the archive's name of our modules does not begin with "xoops2" ???
3/ Because there is a ".project" file in our modules when some other modules write some hidden texts in ALL of YOUR pages .... ??????

Where is the "logic" ?



[Edit by bender]Posting transfered from another thread which was not for discussion.

Please note that in my opinion this is based on a missunderstand. (see next post)

[quote]
Bender wrote:
[
b][u]Rejected due to files missing[/u][/b]

[
b]Boox 1.1[/b]                        [url=http://www.instant-zero.com/]home[/url]    [url=http://xoops.instant-zero.com/modules/mydownloads/visit.php?cid=10&lid=9]dl[/url]        --- [i]REASON: [color=cc3300]License file[/color]; SIDENOTE: Eclipse projectfile, filename xoops2_[/i]
[b]iSearch 1.6[/b]                        [url=http://www.instant-zero.com/]home[/url]    [url=http://xoops.instant-zero.com/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?cid=8&lid=6]dl[/url]        --- [i]REASON: [color=cc3300]License file[/color]; SIDENOTE: Eclipse projectfile, filename xoops2_[/i]
[b]Marquee 2.42[/b]                        [url=http://www.instant-zero.com/]home[/url]    [url=http://xoops.instant-zero.com/xoops/marquee.zip]dl[/url]                                            --- [i]REASON: [color=cc3300]License file[/color]; SIDENOTE: Eclipse projectfile, filename xoops2_[/i]
[b]MyIframe 1.4[/b]                        [url=http://www.instant-zero.com/]home[/url]    [url=http://xoops.instant-zero.com/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?cid=6&lid=4]dl[/url]        --- [i]REASON: [color=cc3300]License file[/color]; SIDENOTE: Eclipse projectfile, filename xoops2_[/i]
[b]NewBBex 1.4[/b]                        [url=http://www.instant-zero.com/]home[/url]    [url=http://xoops.instant-zero.com/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?cid=4&lid=2]dl[/url]        --- [i]REASON: [color=cc3300]License file[/color]; SIDENOTE: Eclipse projectfile, filename xoops2_[/i]
[b]News[/b]                        [url=http://www.instant-zero.com/]home[/url]    [url=http://xoops.instant-zero.com/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?cid=2&lid=8]dl[/url]        --- [i]REASON: [color=cc3300]License file[/color]; SIDENOTE: Eclipse projectfile, filename xoops2_[/i]
[b]Shortcuts 1.4[/b]                        [url=http://www.instant-zero.com/]home[/url]    [url=http://xoops.instant-zero.com/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?cid=7&lid=5]dl[/url]        --- [i]REASON: [color=cc3300]License file[/color]; SIDENOTE: Eclipse projectfile, filename xoops2_[/i]
[b]Userpage 1.21[/b]        [url=http://www.instant-zero.com/]home[/url]    [url=http://xoops.instant-zero.com/modules/mydownloads/visit.php?cid=3&lid=1]dl[/url]        --- [i]REASON: [color=cc3300]License file[/color]; SIDENOTE: Eclipse projectfile, filename xoops2_[/i]
[b]XoopsCare 1.0[/b]        [url=http://www.instant-zero.com/]home[/url]    [url=http://xoops.instant-zero.com/modules/mydownloads/visit.php?cid=12&lid=27]dl[/url]        --- [i]REASON: [color=cc3300]License file, readme[/color]; SIDENOTE: Eclipse projectfile, filename xoops2_[/i]
[/quote]
YEAHH !!!! STRIKE ... :-)
Thank you VERY MUCH100of our products are rejected  :-o  8-)  :lol

What an [b]excellent[/bnews isn't it ? ;-)


Just tell me ... Do you still list XOOPS 1 modules ?
No ? So do I.
Do you see a new XOOPS version except than a 2.0.x declared as stable ? No ? So do I.
Can you download a new version of XOOPS ? No ? So do I.
Ok, one point is clear



Now concerning the licence file ... hum... do you really know the GPL licence, also called the "virus licence" ?
In short, everything made for a product with a GPL licence [b]IS ALSO in GPL licence[/b] ... ok, another point clear.


The "sidenotes" ....
Hummm ...
[quote]
SIDENOTE: Eclipse projectfile, 
[/quote]
In what it'
s a sidenote or a problem ?
Have you thought to "sidenote" the "thumbs.db" files too ???

[
quote]
filename xoops2_
[/quote]
See my first pointXOOPS 1 is dead and we don't have anything else than XOOPS 2.0.x ...

PS : A [b]REALLY[/b] sidenote, those modules who include some hidden texts in their output ;-)



*** EDIT ***
Thank you VERY MUCH for removing AND censoring our posts.
thank you
Here is our original post, for the "records".


[Edit by Bender] So where exactly is the difference between that screenshot and the text above? I did not remove a word so what are you talking about?
However you originally posted in a thread which has a big disclaimer that everything posted there will be removed. Instead of deleting it i copied it over here.




TopTop
« 1 ... 5 6 7 (8)



Login

Who's Online

181 user(s) are online (131 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 181


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Apr 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits