What you want is when a use is registered he will be assigned to the group 'mynewgroup', right?
Which version XOOPS do you use?
Catzwolf wrote:
This has to stop, Xoops has to sit down collectively and work together in one goal with one vision and not as a bunch of individuals like we are now.
And as to regards to your comment about DJ having to come and fix other peoples work. If you had proper testing procedures and a quality of service for this area, these issues would have been found and corrected long before they where committed to the main branch.
Peekay wrote:
my question is, why has this method been changed and what benefits in terms of speed, efficiency and security are we gaining from that change?
redheadedrod wrote:
...
We really just need to work with what we have and not worry about what the future holds. And hope in the process that DJ can make some serious progress and bring some new ideas to the table. And if it all does happen like that and we end up with a 3.0 then great, we will spend the next 6 months upgrading modules and such to make them work with 3.0...
Thank you trabis!
I did not realize you saved XOOPS once by the revision:
Quote:
Revision #### - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs]
Modified Fri Jun 12 00:40:14 2009 UTC (11 months, 3 weeks ago) by trabis
Original Path: XoopsCore/trunk/htdocs/modules/system/admin/groups/main.php
File length: 11976 byte(s)
Diff to previous ####
Removing ####, ####, etc
(we need to this other way, really!)
I felt really desperate when I looked at revision ##### and was about to give up cleaning XOOPS svn.
But, thanks god I saw your great decision on revision #####.
Thanks!
I will continue.