XOOPS 
Forum
Forum Index General Forums Community Support Modules Support Themes Support Development International Support Module Hack Reviews Theme Designer Talk


« 1 2 3 4 (5) 6 »


41
Defkon1
Re: CAPTCHA hack for xoops comments?

  • 2006/9/21 22:20

  • Defkon1

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 151

  • Since: 2005/1/27


Quote:

carnuke wrote:
I have tried both these hacks and niether of them do anything. Yes, I am logged out as anonymous. The comment form is exactly as before with no image input.

Overwrite all files as instructed
updated system module
cleared cache.

nothing


have you installed SecurityImage class correctly?

in class/xoopsformloader.php add the line:
include_once XOOPS_ROOT_PATH."/class/xoopsform/securityimage.php";


and all dir in uploads/securityimage have to be writable.

you can view this hack at work in my blog www.fottutamente.it ...
Topic | Forum


42
Defkon1
Re: CAPTCHA hack for xoops comments?

  • 2006/9/21 15:00

  • Defkon1

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 151

  • Since: 2005/1/27


Quote:

Defkon1 wrote:
Quote:

carnuke wrote:
Thanks Tempri and Pinmaster for the hack. I tried this on 2.0.13.2 and was unable to get it to work.

Updated XOOPS system module as well as installed the captcha module.

In module admin the following was OK

Library GD : Installed -- bundled (2.0.28 compatible)
Check of the presence of the class SecurityImage : Installed
Check of the use of the class SecurityImage : Installed

Must have done something wrong


try to post with a non-admin account (as registered or anonymous user)...


or try directly my xComments CrystalHack
Topic | Forum


43
Defkon1
Re: xComments CrystalHack (antispam+new form field)

  • 2006/9/21 14:28

  • Defkon1

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 151

  • Since: 2005/1/27


Thanks to GlaDiac is now possible to use this hack on php5, too!

HowTo
Topic | Forum


44
Defkon1
Re: NewBB Spam Posts - Any simple challenge hack avail?

  • 2006/9/21 14:25

  • Defkon1

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 151

  • Since: 2005/1/27


Quote:

GlaDiaC wrote:
Here are my bugfixes for PHP 5+

[CUT]


thank you very much! with this hack i can use my xComments CrystalHack on php5 too!

but i think that in the first block of code on line 3:
$security_image->init();

should be:
$security_image->initImage();
Topic | Forum


45
Defkon1
xComments CrystalHack (antispam+new form field)

  • 2006/9/11 21:06

  • Defkon1

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 151

  • Since: 2005/1/27


xoopscomments CrystalHack is a comments system hack that implements SecurityImage class by DuGris and a new "Username" form field.
This new field will allow anonymous users to specify a nickname to display instead of "Anonymous".

I think that the power of DuGris' class joined to the simplicity of my hack
will allow the webmasters to open comments functionality to anonymous users without worrying about spammer.

i succesfully tested it on XOOPS 2.0.13.2 and 2.0.14.

hope you'll like it...

Download

EDIT/
alternative download site: dev.xoops.org
Topic | Forum


46
Defkon1
Re: CAPTCHA hack for xoops comments?

  • 2006/9/11 13:28

  • Defkon1

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 151

  • Since: 2005/1/27


Quote:

carnuke wrote:
Thanks Tempri and Pinmaster for the hack. I tried this on 2.0.13.2 and was unable to get it to work.

Updated XOOPS system module as well as installed the captcha module.

In module admin the following was OK

Library GD : Installed -- bundled (2.0.28 compatible)
Check of the presence of the class SecurityImage : Installed
Check of the use of the class SecurityImage : Installed

Must have done something wrong


try to post with a non-admin account (as registered or anonymous user)...
Topic | Forum


47
Defkon1
Re: What BLOG to use?

  • 2006/9/4 12:56

  • Defkon1

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 151

  • Since: 2005/1/27


Quote:

n01un0 wrote:

Improvements:
- anti-trackback-spam from Hodaka:
http://www.kuri3.net/modules/weblog/details.php?blog_id=68


ehm... the linked page seems to be largely attacked by trackback spammers...
Topic | Forum


48
Defkon1
Re: 2.0.13.2 vs 2.0.14

  • 2006/8/21 12:45

  • Defkon1

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 151

  • Since: 2005/1/27


Quote:

Herko Coomans wrote:
Then I'm repeating my answer: 2.0.14 is recommended for production websites, over 2.2.4 (and 2.0.13.2 of course).

Herko


i'm sorry. i misunderstood your first answer...

THANK YOU VERY MUCH!

Topic | Forum


49
Defkon1
Re: 2.0.13.2 vs 2.0.14

  • 2006/8/20 23:03

  • Defkon1

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 151

  • Since: 2005/1/27


up
Topic | Forum


50
Defkon1
Re: 2.0.13.2 vs 2.0.14

  • 2006/8/18 13:16

  • Defkon1

  • Not too shy to talk

  • Posts: 151

  • Since: 2005/1/27


thx for your reply.

i've read the release notes and i did not find any info about its "recommended" status or not.

i only read:
Quote:

This is mainly a maintenance release containing a lot of bugfixes, but it also provides many enhancements implemented to lessen the gap between the 2.0, 2.2 and 2.3 branches.


so, this maintenance release is recommended for production sites? what should i reply to italian users who are posting this question?

Defkon1
-XoopsItalia.org CoWebmaster
Topic | Forum



TopTop
« 1 2 3 4 (5) 6 »



[Advanced Search]

Login

Register now!  |  Lost Password?

Search

Advanced Search

Recent Posts

Who's Online

205 user(s) are online (128 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)

Members: 0

Guests: 205

more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Apr 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits