21
Chappy
Re: Repository: A list of modules
  • 2007/5/1 1:54

  • Chappy

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 456

  • Since: 2002/12/14


MMM...It tastes like chicken! ...



22
Chappy
SmartMail
  • 2007/5/1 1:49

  • Chappy

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 456

  • Since: 2002/12/14


Modulename and version
Quote:
SmartMail .8 Alpha


Short description
Quote:
SmartMail is a XOOPS module for creating and publishing e-newsletters. It is fully integrated with XOOPS permissions, the XOOPS membership module, and can automatically pull content from any other module. Publication can be manual, or fully automatic (with a cron tab) on an admin defined reoccurring schedule.


Detailed description
Quote:
The SmartMail module is being developed by SmartFactory. It takes an entirely new approach to the standard newsletter module, extracting data from the various modules into the newsletter, forming the newsletter so that it can be easily updated, and features blocks, and several other novel interfaces. There are three mechanisms for the newsletter dispatch. It is easy to have several different newsletters for different user groups by preparing the separate templates and having the module extract the data. The data can then be sent using one or more cron commands.

At this time SmartMail is very much in the developmental stage. It is not recommended for production sites. With it's multiple methodologies, it has a fairly steep learning curve needing a goodly number of adaptations to get it to function for an individual site. The forums have a fair amount of information but, again, it still lacks some documentation.

From the SmartFactory site:
Quote:

Features:

* Multiple List Creation
* Newsletter Templates Management
* Subscriber Management
* List Permissions
* Module Blocks
* Content Assembly
* Dispatch Preview




Version
Quote:
.80 alpha


Publisher
Quote:

Home Page
Quote:

System Requirements
Quote:
2.0.16


Screenshot links
Quote:
MMM...It tastes like chicken! ...



23
Chappy
Re: The Wave of Change IS Upon Us!
  • 2007/4/20 11:12

  • Chappy

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 456

  • Since: 2002/12/14


Quote:

web-M wrote:
Well maybe a for users only forum could be a good option for discussions that could scare off new XOOPS users.

BUT.....

Quote:

ANY AND ALL contentious arguments could be immediately moved there then there would be no more... you shut me up.
Let them have their say... Even when they don't know how to be polite but may have a point worth considering.


I think we should not want to let fall the XOOPSetiquettes overthere. It's my opinion that every discussion has to be with respect for eachother. Otherwise we still lose people(menbers) be the rude and painfull atacks of others that want to hurt them.


I certainly am in favor of this change - a separate members only forum. I am notin favor of it being a free-for-all of abuse as noted above. To say that one is free to speak ones mind is not the same as saying that you can be abusive or disrespectful. xoops.org is not a social experiment for civil libertarians. It is a place where we are about the work of creating a leading-edge CMS and the community to to support that CMS. The one cannot exist without the other.

Having been here for a while and seeing these destructive threads, the lists of people who have moved on (and who I fear might move on - jensclas - and others who are exactly what this community needs), there is no evidence that open, unbridled, and offensive speech has produced any good for xoops. To the contrary, it has hurt us - at least as much as the supposed secretiveness and isolation of devlopers.

I am NOT arguing for the suppression of ideas, suggestions, differences in opinion, and improvement; indeed, I have participated in calling for improvement. But hopefully not at the risk of speaking destructively of others. We cannot (nor should we) tolerate abusiveness. Again, we are not solely about a piece of software - we are also about community. The one serves the other.
MMM...It tastes like chicken! ...



24
Chappy
Re: The Wave of Change IS Upon Us!
  • 2007/4/19 4:33

  • Chappy

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 456

  • Since: 2002/12/14


This is welcome news after an utterly ridiculous, nearly obscene weekend. I am sure this will be a major step forward.

I do hope though that there will be a long, genuine, and fervent effort to work towards building more community. There is a cry for patience. Patience is much easier to obtain when a depth of community and all that it entails is in place - communicating, supporting, treating one another with a modicum of decency.

If we fail to respect one another - then the software and indeed XOOPS may just as well sign off now. The truth is - this past weekend reminded me of so many nasty fights I've seen in the name of religion. Inevitably, one split leads to another, leads to another, ad infinitum (perhaps a cautionary word to those who feel they can do better?). I really don't want to be around that kind of atmosphere. And we harm ourselves if we leave folks around here who have NO interest in community. Since about 2002 (I think it's been that long?) I've been stopping by here often three or four times a day. For some of that time, it's been a cheery experience where people help each other and do so kindly, saying thanks, etc. But, these folks who just come in here to tear the hell out of the community - they don't care about the wake they leave, the people they hurt. The community must come first, IMHO. I hope we can commit to that. Committing to a code release is much smaller potatoes...A few process changes and the other stuff will be fine. Nothing can cover for disrespect.

This speaks to my calls for someone to assist with steering XOOPS who is not primarily a coder, someone who advocates for both the community AND the developers. I genuinely hope that this is heard. I think it will benefit the community in important ways.

I apologize for all the ramblings... I'm just trying to make sense of all the sad stuff of this weekend here at XOOPS and - maybe in a larger sense - the pain life inflicts via mean people (eg. the UV shootings). I hope we can get on to being a kind place again...
MMM...It tastes like chicken! ...



25
Chappy
Re: Protector 3.02 question
  • 2007/4/18 15:28

  • Chappy

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 456

  • Since: 2002/12/14


And as you said, keep the folder name hard to guess with a mix of characters...
MMM...It tastes like chicken! ...



26
Chappy
Re: XOOPS backend makeover
  • 2007/4/14 2:32

  • Chappy

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 456

  • Since: 2002/12/14


Very nice, tmreg! That would be an improvement!
MMM...It tastes like chicken! ...



27
Chappy
Re: Protector
  • 2007/4/5 2:12

  • Chappy

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 456

  • Since: 2002/12/14


Here's some of mine (identifying items changed or deleted):

Quote:

define('XOOPS_GROUP_ADMIN', '1');
define('XOOPS_GROUP_USERS', '2');
define('XOOPS_GROUP_ANONYMOUS', '3');


foreach ( array('GLOBALS', '_SESSION', 'HTTP_SESSION_VARS', '_GET', 'HTTP_GET_VARS', '_POST', 'HTTP_POST_VARS', '_COOKIE', 'HTTP_COOKIE_VARS', '_REQUEST', '_SERVER', 'HTTP_SERVER_VARS', '_ENV', 'HTTP_ENV_VARS', '_FILES', 'HTTP_POST_FILES', 'xoopsDB', 'xoopsUser', 'xoopsUserId', 'xoopsUserGroups', 'xoopsUserIsAdmin', 'xoopsConfig', 'xoopsOption', 'xoopsModule', 'xoopsModuleConfig', 'xoopsRequestUri') as $bad_global ) {
if ( isset( $_REQUEST[$bad_global] ) ) {
header( 'Location: '.XOOPS_URL.'/' );
exit();
}
}
//added following line for protector
include XOOPS_TRUST_PATH.'/modules/protector/include/precheck.inc.php' ;

if (!isset($xoopsOption['nocommon']) && XOOPS_ROOT_PATH != '') {
include XOOPS_ROOT_PATH."/include/common.php";
}

//added following line for protector
include XOOPS_TRUST_PATH.'/modules/protector/include/postcheck.inc.php' ;

}


When I first installed, I also got a Blank Page error. The following link helped me debug it:

http://xoops.peak.ne.jp/md/d3forum/index.php?post_id=6400
MMM...It tastes like chicken! ...



28
Chappy
Re: Block user information to anonymous users?
  • 2007/3/22 3:05

  • Chappy

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 456

  • Since: 2002/12/14


For myself, I just don't allow anonymous users to have access to the user profile module (if that's what your using). BTW, in case you are not aware of where to get that module, its available at SmartFactory.
MMM...It tastes like chicken! ...



29
Chappy
Re: a new step (may be) toward the mystic 'Holy Grail'
  • 2007/3/22 3:00

  • Chappy

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 456

  • Since: 2002/12/14


I didn't see a link for download of this theme. Is that what you intended? I posted elsewhere (https://xoops.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=52332&start=60#forumpost255944 a few words about your great work on on this.
MMM...It tastes like chicken! ...



30
Chappy
Re: CSS100 [Holy Grail CSS Wireframe Theme]
  • 2007/3/22 2:56

  • Chappy

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 456

  • Since: 2002/12/14


BTW, Technigrafa,

Your site is looking great and it seems like you're doing some really neat stuff. I used your changes and it did improve the appearance of the site. I should have followed up sooner. Thanks!
MMM...It tastes like chicken! ...




TopTop
« 1 2 (3) 4 5 6 ... 31 »



Login

Who's Online

142 user(s) are online (91 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 142


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Apr 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits