11
mczolton
Re: Simple question - Why?
  • 2005/4/24 20:25

  • mczolton

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 31

  • Since: 2004/4/27


I have multiple themes on my site. Some use a fixed width layout and others a variable width layout. I develop all of my themes so they are at least usable in 800x600 without any distracting flaws. I target 1024x768 though. Anything less than 800x600 and the layout begins to break down.

As far as fixed width layouts are concerned, there are many reason why you would want to do this. A few include:

1) Fixed width is easier to design for.

2) Variable width layouts can become difficult to read on exceptionally large (or small) resolutions.

3) Browsers handle the box model differently. Sort of goes along with point number 1.

Ultimately, both have their merits and demerits. I try to target an average resolution while making the page usable in higher and lower resolutions.

Mark



12
mczolton
Re: Persistant Database Connections
  • 2005/4/23 14:51

  • mczolton

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 31

  • Since: 2004/4/27


Excellent, thank you for the update.

Mark



13
mczolton
Re: Looking for new hosting..
  • 2005/4/21 2:35

  • mczolton

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 31

  • Since: 2004/4/27


Hyperpod,

I also use Dreamhost but find them to be a bit slow in the MySQL department. Have you experienced this? If so, were you able to optimize XOOPS in this regard?

Thanks,
mark



14
mczolton
Zeroculture.org Needs Your Help
  • 2005/4/21 2:28

  • mczolton

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 31

  • Since: 2004/4/27


zeroculture.org is a community driven website focused on technology, cinema, home theater, current events, and pop culture (among other things).

We've been around for a few months now and really need some help getting new members, news subitions, and forum topics. We're a fun group of people that like to argue and chat about all sorts of entertaining topics.

Please check us out if you get a chance.

http://www.zeroculture.org

Thanks for the support!

Mark



15
mczolton
Re: No signatures
  • 2005/4/21 2:14

  • mczolton

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 31

  • Since: 2004/4/27


Bump...

I haven't heard about this for a while and noticed that it was still a problem in 2.0.9.3.

Thanks,
Mark



16
mczolton
Persistant Database Connections
  • 2005/4/21 2:11

  • mczolton

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 31

  • Since: 2004/4/27


Would someone kindly explain to me what persistant database connections are and when I should use them. Also, what (if any) performace increase will I see with them enabled (disabled)?

Thanks,
Mark



17
mczolton
Re: No signatures
  • 2004/10/7 17:32

  • mczolton

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 31

  • Since: 2004/4/27


Bump.

I am having the same problem with XOOPS 2.0.7.3. The only hack I have applied is the newBB 'View Posts Since Last Visit' hack. It doesn't touch the comment code though.

Mark



18
mczolton
Re: newbb pro
  • 2004/5/14 20:11

  • mczolton

  • Friend of XOOPS

  • Posts: 31

  • Since: 2004/4/27


I hate to resurrect a dead topic, but this is a relevant issue for me as well. I understand that there are no upgrade scripts as of yet. However, could one of the developers chime in with some instructions on what needs to be upgraded? It doesn’t have to be a detailed description. I can handle building new tables in the database and whatnot. If the process requires migrating data from one table to another, I am sure I can throw something together.

Thanks,
Mark




TopTop
« 1 (2)



Login

Who's Online

103 user(s) are online (72 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 103


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: Apr 30
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits