2
Quote:
Now it's a licencied product ? Not anymore Open Source ?
wishcraft wrote:
I am wondering who will offer the first validator for XOOPS, that is something that will validate your got a licenced version of Xoops..
Now it's a licencied product ? Not anymore Open Source ?
4
Simply type :
It does not change anything to call it from the head or from the "bottom".
Yahoo even advice to call JS scripts in the bottom of the pages ...
echo "<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.example.org/myscript.js"></script>";
8
Most of the sites content is maintained by non technician people so they need a WYSIWYG editor with images uploading features.
The question is which one to adopt, may be it's interesting to see what other projects have done (Wordpress for example), what editors projects are alive still a long time and maintained.
Personnaly I vote for Tiny MCE.
The question is which one to adopt, may be it's interesting to see what other projects have done (Wordpress for example), what editors projects are alive still a long time and maintained.
Personnaly I vote for Tiny MCE.
9
I'll change it in the opposite way, XOOPS 2.0.x will be tested and if it's not this version, it will be used in the >= 2.3 way.
10
Ok sorry, but I persist on 2 points :
1/ It's not a good idea to change the code of running modules for a BETA version
2/ It's time to adopt a definitive editor
1/ It's not a good idea to change the code of running modules for a BETA version
2/ It's time to adopt a definitive editor
Login
Search
Recent Posts
Who's Online
Donat-O-Meter
| Stats | |
| Goal: | $100.00 |
| Due Date: | Apr 30 |
| Gross Amount: | $0.00 |
| Net Balance: | $0.00 |
| Left to go: | $100.00 |
 |
|