| Re: wfsections WYSIWYG editor bug? |
| by ibzan on 2003/11/7 7:40:59 Quote: Yes I agree that this would be helpfull to everyone out there. Shame on me
|
| Re: wfsections WYSIWYG editor bug? |
| by Catzwolf on 2003/11/7 7:37:23 Quote:
Yes I agree that this would be helpfull to everyone out there. you just put another few days on the release LOL |
| Re: wfsections WYSIWYG editor bug? |
| by ibzan on 2003/11/7 7:33:29 Quote: Instead, WF will use a very heavily modified SPAW WYSIWYG editor and I hopefully have fixed many of the problems related with the previous versions in this area. Great to hear! One thought may be of some use... (yep more free advice )Instead of having to switch from the WSYIWYG editor to the XOOPS editor from within the preferances, might it be helpful to allow the switch the same way we now currently switch from teh WSYIWYG editor to the HTML? Kind of like either a button the cycles between all three, or a seperate link opposite the WSYIWYG / HTML editor to switch between XOOPS and WSYIWYG. blessings, Chris |
| Re: wfsections WYSIWYG editor bug? |
| by Catzwolf on 2003/11/6 22:08:31 LOL Not the option for the choice Shine, but the old WYSIWYG editor. Thats all
|
| Re: wfsections WYSIWYG editor bug? |
| by Shine on 2003/11/6 21:51:25 Quote: This option has been available for a looooooonnnggggg time, check in WF main config Yes I know,...that is why I love the available choice option and used it <grinz>. Like I previously said,......I went back to the xoopseditor within WFS. ![]() Hmmzz,.....are you sure you are going/want to delete this wysiwyg/xoopseditor option within the future version? Cause I love to work with it, bcause it feels like I have more control over certain things. Oh well, you know me, as usual this girlie is somewhat euhh a bit ehm conservatif...... Grtz., Shine @ Catz: nice to see that you are back !! |